|
The Chicago Bar Association Tort Litigation Committee's |
Tort Reporter |
|
Interview with Honorable Ronald DavisBy Thomas J. Keevers“If you need
to get something done, ask a busy person,” goes the old maxim—and
around the Circuit Court of Cook County that person would be Judge Ronald
Davis. Just observing his energy at the court house, at the CBA and
the ISBA, not to mention his volunteer work, would leave a fit man breathless. Judge Davis’s
career in law spans almost fifty years, about half spent as a practicing
lawyer. Having worked in an extensive litigation practice, Judge Davis
was able to bring a balanced view to the bench. He represented plaintiffs
in a wide range of actions, among them air crash, products, and medical
negligence cases, but he defended cases too, for a number of small insurance
companies. An associate
since 1983, Judge Davis began his judicial career hearing Delinquency,
Abuse, and Neglect cases, moving on to spend a number of years in the
First Municipal District, and is currently a judge in the law division,
hearing motions on motion call “C.” He has presided over approximately
350 jury trials—personal injury, torts, and contracts. He has been
affirmed on 58 of 65 appeals. “I’ve
watched the law unfold,” he said. “It’s been so interesting,
watching it develop. There were few medical negligence cases before
the sixties. Since then, comparative negligence came in, and products
liability. Monier v. Chamberlain really revolutionized
the discovery process. Before that, a lot of the discovery, things we
take for granted, was off-limits. Trying a case was largely guesswork
and hunches. Trial by ambush was all too common.” Asked if it’s
better now, he nodded emphatically. “Definitely better,” he said.
“Lawyers are better. They’re better prepared, better read.” The
judge did not agree with the often-expressed opinion that lawyers are
less civil now than they used to be. “No, it was worse in the old
days," he said. "Some of the old-timers seemed to take pride
in their abrasiveness. And I can’t help but think that one important
refining element is the women. There were very few women lawyers back
then, especially in litigation. It was a little like the wild west.” Being a motion
judge means lots of reading, and when Judge Davis is not hearing contested
motions in the afternoon, he is absorbed in studying the mountains of
briefs submitted for pending motions. Asked if he had any tips for brief-writers,
he said, “Yes. Be brief.” Though Judge
Davis has a very busy schedule, his contribution to the legal community
doesn’t end at the courthouse. He is a frequent lecturer at bar association
and judicial seminars on the subjects of evidence, trial technique,
and civil procedure. At the CBA, he has chaired the Tort Litigation
Committee, Executive Civil Practice and Procedure Committee, Continuing
Legal Education Committee, and Medical –Legal Committee. He is also
a trained intervenor with the Lawyers’ Assistance Program, where he
has been active for over ten years. His generous service has earned
him the program’s John Powers Crowley award. But the generosity
of this man is not limited to the legal community. For the past twelve
years, Judge Davis has been a volunteer worker with the “Feed the
Homeless” project for North Shore Congregation Israel. And for fourteen
years, he volunteered his time at the Whitehall Nursing Home. The interview
nearly ended, Judge Davis was asked if he had any advice for lawyers
presenting motions. “First tell the judge why you’re there, what
your motion is,” he said. “It sounds so simple, but so many lawyers
begin by relating facts, or telling you the history, or how complicated
the case is. You’re there for a very specific reason—start with
that. Tell the judge what you’re asking for, then whatever else you
say will have some context.” © 2012 by The Chicago Bar Association. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. The opinions and positions stated in signed material are those of the authors and not by the fact of publication necessarily those of the Association or its members. |
|